spanning_tree_protocol
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| spanning_tree_protocol [2024/01/18 13:16] – [Two Switches with Single Link] walkeradmin | spanning_tree_protocol [2024/01/18 13:26] (current) – [Introduction] walkeradmin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Spanning Tree Protocol essentially stops packet loops (where the same packet transports around your switches constantly) which causes broadcast storms and thus grinds the network to a complete halt. | Spanning Tree Protocol essentially stops packet loops (where the same packet transports around your switches constantly) which causes broadcast storms and thus grinds the network to a complete halt. | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | <color # | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 288: | Line 291: | ||
| Remember this Statement regarding STP - //**When a switch receives a broadcast message, that switch will forward that message out of every interface on that switch, except the one it was received on. | Remember this Statement regarding STP - //**When a switch receives a broadcast message, that switch will forward that message out of every interface on that switch, except the one it was received on. | ||
| **// | **// | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Having STP running is not going to cause any issues, and in fact as a safety measure is still quite good (who knows who might bridge the switches with a second cable). | Having STP running is not going to cause any issues, and in fact as a safety measure is still quite good (who knows who might bridge the switches with a second cable). | ||
spanning_tree_protocol.1705583794.txt.gz · Last modified: by walkeradmin